Home » Behind the Image » Behind the Image: M42 in the City
Behind the Image BLOG Deep Sky Nebulae

Behind the Image: M42 in the City

Orion Nebula M42 Astrotanja

The Orion Nebula (M42) is easy to capture, but difficult to master!

M42 is undoubtedly one of the most popular deep sky targets. Whether you image through a telescope or a camera lens, it can be captured from anywhere on earth, by anyone who knows where to point their camera.

Sponsored advertisement

So imagine my surprise when my image of M42 was shortlisted for The Astrophotographer of the Year 2014 award!

What most people don’t know about this image is that I photographed it from my home in Johannesburg, South Africa, the most light polluted city on the entire African continent! I know – unbelievable, right? I did it without the use of any light pollution filters and with a Canon 60Da DSLR through my APO telescope.

So why do I think this image made the cut to get shortlisted, and why am so I incredibly proud of this achievement?

Simple. Dedication.

  • Don’t use light pollution as an excuse – image anyway.
  • Research the target you’re shooting, find out what other imaging techniques have worked well for others. In M42’s case it’s varied exposures to retain detail in the bright areas.
  • Gather enough data, as much as you can! Every single additional sub exposure helps to increase SNR and allows you to bring out more detail. If the imaging conditions are right, take advantage of it, sleep can wait.
  • Focus on post-processing! Superior processing skills can make images from most modest photographic equipment look superb.

M42 is a glorious mix of diffuse nebulae and one of the the brightest nebulae in the sky. It’s a wonderful target for novice and experienced imagers, as there’s always more detail to find.

Processing M42

For this image I used the HDRcomposition function in PixInsight to preserve the inner core of the structure. I only shot 2 exposure series’ of 60 seconds and 240 seconds. I think I could have further retained more detail had I shot 30 or 45-second exposures for integration as well. Similarly, had I added 5 or 6 minute longer-exposure subs to this, the other faint data would have shown through. In the final image, however, you will notice that some dark nebula does show up.

Here’s the PixInsight forum link on the HDRcomposition I followed  (click here), it’s also an example of M42 which proves advantageous.

I’m surprised about the data managed for a total integration time of 3 hours 16 minutes. I shot this at prime focus on my APO from an extremely light-polluted sky in Johannesburg’s suburbs with no use of any LP filters. Granted, my APO is renowned for its colour quality, but the result is still very impressive considering I’m shooting from the brightest spot in Africa.

M42 is an easy target as it is the brightest diffuse nebula in the sky, but I also dedicated a lot more imaging time to the target than I have with any session prior to this. Ideal imaging position in my sky only starts at 1 or 2am in October, so I split the total imaging time over 2 nights. (I set up early and caught some sleep beforehand!)

Acquisition details

  • Total: 196min (3 hours 16 minutes)
  • 40x 240sec ISO400
  • 36x 60sec ISO400
  • 20 darks for each exposure length
  • 100 bias
  • 30 flats

Calibration frames

If you’re not shooting these already, it’s time to start. Darks, flats, and bias frames will assist with improving your lights, resulting in an overall better image with less noise and even illumination. If you don’t know how to shoot flats yet, read this easy to follow tutorial.

This is a single 240sec image (with auto stretch applied) that has not been calibrated with flats, darks, or bias frames:

Single 240 sec light frame
Single 240sec light frame

This is a single 240sec image (with auto stretch applied) that’s been calibrated with flats, darks, and bias frames:

Single 240 sec light frame calibrated with darks, bias and flat frames
Single 240sec light frame calibrated with darks, bias, and flat frames

This is the 40×240sec calibrated images, integrated (“stacked”):

40x 240sec calibrated frames integrated
40x 240sec calibrated frames integrated

This is the combined 40×240sec stack and 36×60sec stacks, integrated with the HDRcomposition tool (auto stretch applied):

40x 240sec and 36x 60sec calibrated frames, integrated with HDRcomposition in PixInsight
Combined 40x240sec and 36x60sec calibrated stacked frames, integrated with HDRcomposition in PixInsight

Workflow: Processing in PixInsight

  • Light frames calibrated with bias/dark/flats, debayered, and aligned. The 60 and 240-second subs had their respective calibration frames.
  • The final 60 and 240-second integrations were then aligned and combined with HDRcomposition.
  • Processing: Crop / DBE / Colour balance / Histogram Stretch / HDRmultiscale, followed by a series of curves adjustments and histogram stretches with star and range masks applied, then ACDNR, and further stretching and sharpening.

Workflow: Photoshop processing

  • Further levels adjustments
  • Saturation
  • Selective layer sharpening

Equipment used to capture the data

  • Camera: Canon 60Da DSLR
  • Telescope: Officina Stellare HiperAPO105
  • Mount: Celestron AdvancedVX
  • Guiding: Orion SSAG, 50mm guide scope, and PHD
  • Acquisition software: Nebulosity
  • Processing software: PixInsight and PhotoShop
Like this article enough to buy the author a drink? (a small donation of $1-$20)

About the author

Tanja Schmitz

Tanja is the co-founder of PhotographingSpace.com with her husband, Cory. She is also the co-owner of several telescopes and Celestron mounts, too many cameras, and not enough hard drive space.

An internationally commissioned and published astrophotographer, her work has been used in multiple online and print publications. Tanja was also shortlisted for the Astronomy Photographer of the Year award.

4 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • Tanja, that´s an incredible work! I wish I could get some decent shot of this nebula, but I don´t have a telescope, only a DSLR and Canon 400 mm f5.6, and no tracker. Have you tried before to get an image of Orion nebula with that lens?

    Thanks!

    • Hello Jose,

      Without counteracting the earth’s rotation with a tracking mount, at 400mm f/5.6 it will be difficult to get a shot without pretty significant star trailing, unfortunately…

  • Fabulous image!

    I’m intrigued by your use of ISO400. I usually see much higher ISOs used for DSOs. Was the lower setting used because of M42 being a relatively bright DSO? Was the light pollution a factor in that choice?

    Thanks!

    • Hi Matt, thanks for the kind words Matt. Yip – the ISO choice was based on shoot location, it’s an urban area with a lot of light pollution. Also the fact that the exposures were already 4 minutes long and the ambient temperature was not cold enough, I didn’t want to generate more noise.

      My dark sky DSOs are generally ISO 800 / 1600 – depending on exposure time on the target and aperture of lens / scope.

From PhotographingSpace.com:

From our Friends at PrimaLuceLab

Sponsored advertisement

Astrophotography Photoshop Actions!

Make your Milky Way POP and finish off your photos like a pro with our Photoshop Action Packs optimized specifically for astrophotography!

YOU can shoot amazing AP!